Every gig platform takes a cut — Careem, Uber, Foodpanda, and Bykea all deduct a commission from what a customer pays before the driver or rider ever sees the money. The question that trips up almost every gig worker filing for the first time: does that commission reduce taxable income, or is it just a cost of doing business that has to be absorbed after tax?
Yes — platform commission is a legitimate deductible business expense. A driver or rider's taxable business income is calculated on net earnings after the platform's cut, fuel, maintenance, and other genuine business costs are deducted from gross fare or delivery value, not on the gross amount a customer originally paid. Understanding exactly what figure to start from and how commission fits into the calculation prevents gig workers from significantly overstating their own tax liability. Kamboh Associates helps gig workers calculate this correctly. WhatsApp 0328-4675162.
The Short Answer: Yes, Commission Is Deductible
Platform commission — the percentage Careem, Uber, Foodpanda, Bykea, or any other gig platform retains from a fare or delivery before paying the driver or rider — is a legitimate, ordinary business expense, deductible against gross business income the same way any marketplace or platform fee is deductible for any other kind of business. A driver or rider doesn't pay tax on the gross fare a customer was charged and then separately absorb the platform's commission as an after-tax cost; the commission reduces taxable income before tax is calculated at all. Understanding this distinction correctly can make a genuinely meaningful, material difference to how much tax a gig worker actually owes relative to what they might otherwise assume if they miscalculate the starting figure from the outset.
Which Figure Actually Matters: Gross Fare, App-Reported Earnings, or Net Payout
Gig platforms typically show a driver or rider several different figures across their app and payment history — the gross fare or order value a customer paid, the platform's commission or service fee, and the net amount actually paid out to the driver or rider. For tax purposes, the starting point is the gross amount attributable to the driver or rider's service (the fare or delivery value before the platform's cut), from which the platform commission is then deducted as a business expense, alongside fuel, maintenance, and other genuine costs — arriving at net taxable business income. A worker who starts their calculation from the already-net payout figure, rather than the gross fare, and then tries to deduct commission again on top of that, is effectively double-counting the deduction incorrectly, while a worker who taxes the gross fare without ever deducting commission at all is significantly overstating their tax liability in the other direction.
Key point: The correct approach starts from gross fare/order value, deducts the platform's commission as one specific expense line among several, and arrives at net taxable income — not from the already-net payout figure treated as if no deduction has yet occurred.
Why Commission Qualifies as a Deductible Expense
The general principle for deducting a business expense is that it must be ordinary and necessary for earning the business income in question — a cost genuinely incurred in the course of generating revenue, not a personal or unrelated expense. Platform commission fits this description clearly: a driver or rider cannot access the customer base, booking system, and payment infrastructure that generates their fares or delivery orders without the platform, and the commission is the direct cost of that access. This is functionally identical to any other marketplace seller paying a platform fee, or any service business paying a referral or booking-platform commission — a well-established, unambiguous category of deductible business expense.
Commission Alongside Other Deductible Costs
Platform commission doesn't stand alone as the only relevant deduction — it sits alongside fuel, vehicle maintenance and repairs, depreciation or lease payments on the vehicle, phone and data costs, and any delivery-specific equipment, all of which reduce gross fare/order value together to arrive at net taxable business income. A gig worker who correctly deducts commission but forgets to also track and deduct fuel and maintenance costs is still understating their available deductions, just in a different category — the full picture requires accounting for all genuine business costs, not just the most visible one shown directly in the app.
Documenting the Commission Deduction
Most gig platforms provide some form of earnings statement or transaction history showing gross fare/order value and the commission deducted for each transaction or settlement period, which serves as reasonable supporting documentation for this specific deduction. A worker relying on this app-provided history should still keep their own separate periodic summary — a simple running total of gross earnings and commission deducted, updated month by month — rather than assuming they can reconstruct a full year's commission figures from the app's interface alone at filing time, particularly since not every platform retains detailed historical data indefinitely or presents it in an easily exportable format — an issue that tends to surface at the worst possible moment, right when a worker actually needs a full year's figures at filing time.
Commission Rates Vary by Platform and Aren't Fixed
Different gig platforms apply different commission percentages, and a given platform's own rate can change over time or vary by specific service type (rides versus deliveries, for instance, on a single platform offering both service categories). A gig worker shouldn't assume a fixed, memorized commission percentage applies uniformly across all their platform income — the actual amount deducted varies by transaction and platform, which is exactly why working from each platform's own reported commission figures, rather than applying an assumed flat rate to estimate the deduction, produces a more accurate result.
When a Platform Doesn't Clearly Itemize Commission
Some gig platforms present earnings in a way that makes the commission figure less than obvious — showing only the net payout without a clear, separate line for the gross fare and the amount retained, or burying the commission breakdown several screens deep in a settings or earnings-detail section rather than the main dashboard. Where this is the case, a worker still needs to establish the correct gross figure and commission amount rather than simply working backward from the net payout and guessing — this may mean checking the platform's help documentation for how earnings are structured, contacting driver/rider support directly to request a clearer breakdown, or, where the platform provides periodic tax or earnings summary documents, using those as the authoritative source rather than the day-to-day app display, which is often designed primarily around the driver's immediate cash-flow needs rather than year-end tax reconciliation.
How This Compares to Other Self-Employed Platform Workers
The same underlying principle — platform fees are deductible business expenses, not an after-tax cost — applies consistently across other kinds of platform-based self-employment in Pakistan, not just ride-hailing and delivery. A freelancer earning through Upwork or Fiverr deducts that platform's service fee from gross project value the same way a Careem driver deducts ride-hailing commission from gross fare value; an online seller deducts marketplace fees from gross sales value the same way. Recognizing this as a consistent, general principle — rather than something specific and unique to gig driving — helps a worker apply the same correct logic even if they later diversify into a different kind of platform-based income beyond driving or delivery, rather than needing to relearn the underlying principle from scratch for every new platform they encounter over the course of a working life.
A Quick Self-Check Before Filing
Before finalizing a return, a gig worker can run a simple sanity check on their own numbers: does the gross earnings figure used match the platform's own reported gross fare or order value, rather than a net payout figure pulled from a bank statement? Has commission been deducted exactly once, not zero times and not twice? Have fuel, maintenance, and other genuine operating costs been added as separate deductions on top of commission, rather than assumed to already be baked into the commission figure somehow? Running through these three questions catches the most common calculation errors before they end up on a filed return, where correcting them later is considerably more involved than getting the numbers right the first time.
Common Mistakes
- Calculating tax on the gross fare without ever deducting platform commission: this significantly overstates taxable income and the resulting tax liability.
- Starting from the already-net payout figure and deducting commission again on top: this double-counts the deduction and understates taxable income incorrectly in the other direction.
- Treating commission as the only deductible expense: fuel, maintenance, depreciation, and other genuine business costs are separate, additional deductions that also need to be tracked.
- Assuming a single fixed commission percentage applies across all platforms and transactions: actual rates vary by platform, service type, and can change over time.
- Not keeping an independent summary of commission deducted over the year: relying entirely on app history that may not be easily accessible or exportable at filing time.
A Worked Example
A ride-hailing driver's app shows gross fares totaling Rs. 1,800,000 for the tax year, with the platform's commission statements showing a combined Rs. 360,000 retained as commission across all trips — leaving a net payout of Rs. 1,440,000 actually deposited to the driver's account. Separately, the driver tracks Rs. 310,000 in fuel, maintenance, and phone/data costs for the year. Calculating taxable business income correctly, the driver starts from the Rs. 1,800,000 gross fare figure, deducts the Rs. 360,000 commission and the Rs. 310,000 other business expenses, arriving at net taxable business income of Rs. 1,130,000 — notably lower than what the driver would have owed tax on had they mistakenly used the full Rs. 1,800,000 gross figure without deducting either commission or other costs, and correctly different from simply taxing the Rs. 1,440,000 net payout without recognizing that commission had already been implicitly excluded from that figure once, not twice. Before finalizing the return, the driver double-checks the platform's monthly commission statements against their own running log to confirm the Rs. 360,000 figure is accurate, rather than relying on a single end-of-year estimate pulled from memory.
Frequently Asked Questions
Get Expert Help — Free Consultation
18+ years experience. FBR registered. Expert reply within 30 minutes.
WhatsApp 0328-4675162